kaal:claim:5254152-032

Subjecting every community vote to review by a council that is not democratically elected defeats the governance value of community voting, as scored for Goldfinch DAO with a governance score of 2.

Source quote, verbatim

involves all community votes being reviewed by the council, which is not democratically elected (G: 2).

From

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024), APPENDIX A: DAO Dataset, Goldfinch DAO, p. 41
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152

Holds when

DAOs where a non elected council holds final say over community votes

Classification

failuresupport: evidencedfailure: unelected council vetofamily: recentralization-driftgovernance-designdao

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is bb2052d809a4615f0f3e2526ba6416293c40d00260149ba4fe6f38addf052796. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/293482669db492ea...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-032.md | sha256sum