kaal:claim:5541658-015

Transparent, explainable models such as those built for the European Court of Human Rights, which paired 97% accuracy with digestible explanations, provide the design template for addressing legal AI's transparency problem.

Source quote, verbatim

Transparent, explainable AI models, such as those developed for the ECHR, which achieved 97% accuracy with digestible explanations, offer a model for addressing these concerns.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025), Transparency and Interpretability, p. 22
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

Holds when

systems using computational models of argument to generate legally grounded explanations

Classification

designsupport: evidencedai-and-agentsdisclosure

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/dd25bf20e5fd443b...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-015.md | sha256sum