kaal:claim:5541658-023

AI's role in legal practice must remain that of a supportive tool rather than a replacement for human judgment, because AI augments legal practice but cannot replicate the empathy and discretion that responsive judging requires.

Source quote, verbatim

AI's role as a supportive tool, rather than a replacement for human judgment, is critical. As emphasized in multiple studies, AI augments legal practice but cannot replicate the empathy and discretion required for responsive judging.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025), Balancing Benefits and Limitations, p. 27
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

Holds when

judicial and adjudicative functions, as distinct from transactional or administrative legal tasks

Classification

normativesupport: arguedinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/14df1693940b0fd1...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-023.md | sha256sum