kaal:claim:5541658-025

The fragmented United States approach to regulating legal AI, resting on voluntary federal standards and a patchwork of state initiatives, prioritizes innovation but fails to address systemic risks comprehensively.

Source quote, verbatim

The U.S. approach prioritizes innovation but struggles to address systemic risks comprehensively.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025), B. United States: Fragmented Oversight and Ethical Guidelines, p. 29
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

Holds when

United States federal and state oversight of AI in legal and judicial contexts

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: fragmented oversight gapfamily: harmonization-and-standardization-failuresystemic-riskrisk-and-incentivesgovernance-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/55049d66c0c3d482...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-025.md | sha256sum