kaal:claim:5541658-026

Regulation of legal AI faces a two sided failure: strict regimes such as the EU AI Act may stifle innovation, while lenient approaches such as the United States risk leaving biases unchecked.

Source quote, verbatim

Strict regulations, like the EU AI Act, may stifle innovation, while lenient approaches, like in the U.S., risk unchecked biases.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025), Challenges in Regulation, p. 30
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

Holds when

comparative regulation of AI in legal and judicial settings

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: innovation versus ethics regulatory tradeofffamily: innovation-chillinginnovationai-and-agents

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/86edcb7188cee95a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-026.md | sha256sum