kaal:claim:5541658-035

Advanced artificial judicial intelligence capable of simulating full judicial processes remains speculative, and its feasibility is limited by ethical concerns including bias and accountability rather than by technical capability alone.

Source quote, verbatim

While current systems, like the Dutch court's traffic violation appeals tool, show promise, AAJI's feasibility is limited by ethical concerns, including bias and accountability.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025), C. Advanced Artificial Judicial Intelligence (AAJI), p. 37
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

Holds when

full automation of judicial processes as opposed to decision support

Classification

predictivesupport: speculativeinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a5ab8616026fd8c0...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-035.md | sha256sum