kaal:claim:5541658-037

Generative AI in judicial settings is far from perfect: it can oversimplify complex judicial deliberations, reduce emotive and cognitive processes to statistical correlations, and introduce biases or interpretive errors.

However, these applications are far from perfect, as generative AI can oversimplify complex judicial deliberations, reduce emotive-cognitive processes to statistical correlations, and introduce biases or interpretive errors.

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025), Judicial Decision-Making Tools, p. 13
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658

• judges using tools such as GPT-4 to draft rulings or analyze arguments

failuresupport: arguedfailure: generative oversimplification of deliberationfamily: human-judgment-displacementai-and-agents

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5080f4a5bc98a48b...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-037.md | sha256sum