kaal:claim:5554218-038

Smart contracts should incorporate clauses that trigger human review in cases of ambiguity, which secures equitable outcomes analogous to judicial discretion and counters the rigidity of deterministic execution.

Source quote, verbatim

For instance, smart contracts can incorporate clauses that trigger human review in cases of ambiguity, ensuring equitable outcomes akin to judicial discretion.

From

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025), 6.5 Overcoming Limitations of the Code is Law Paradigm, p. 37
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218 · source PDF

Cite as

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218

Holds when

ambiguous coded terms
circumstances not anticipated in the code

Classification

designsupport: arguedlaw-and-legal-systemssmart-contracts

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/cc8402645123227d...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-038.md | sha256sum