kaal:claim:6192998-011

The 2018 system produces only binary accept or reject outcomes, so it has no way to express intermediate assessments such as good but not great, or excellent innovation with poor execution.

Problem 1: Binary validation only. The system produces only binary outcomes (accept/reject). No mechanism exists to say "good but not great" or "excellent innovation, poor execution."

Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution (2026), II.D. Identified Limitations of the Original Framework, p. 15
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6192998 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6192998

failuresupport: arguedfailure: binary-validation-onlyfamily: measurement-and-metric-failureinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is b04292561ee041e0c9eaa7eca28a410ed440e76a95743a539361a3f76c97f2b3. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/7e889ed047c0a0b8...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6192998-011.md | sha256sum