kaal:claim:6244278-007

In genuinely poorly defined contexts, where the task includes choosing what merits attention and committing resources under irreducible uncertainty, no scaffold can be pre-specified without collapsing the problem into a defined one; prompting therefore cannot close the judgment gap.

Source quote, verbatim

no equivalent scaffold can be pre-specified without collapsing the problem into a defined one.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, AI's Mother's Instinct Engineered Consequence Emergent Ethics and the Institutional Trajectory Toward Agentic Alignment (2026), III. The Prompt Engineering Paradox, p. 6
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6244278 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, AI's Mother's Instinct Engineered Consequence Emergent Ethics and the Institutional Trajectory Toward Agentic Alignment (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6244278

Holds when

task itself includes selecting what merits attention and living with irreversible consequences

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: scaffold collapsefamily: human-judgment-displacementinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 53533cdcc081184e7a376516ad4fece0a64ce49f6c8931b6a2c2e98ed914a84b. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/35744f7853c2e26f...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6244278-007.md | sha256sum