kaal:claim:6269518-014

The existing citation-weighted framework provides no mechanism for verifying citation accuracy, no separate incentive for honest attribution, and no penalty for strategic under-citation, so the gap is a structural absence in the mechanism design rather than an oversight in presentation.

This gap is not merely an oversight in presentation. It reflects a structural absence in the mechanism design. The existing framework provides no mechanism for verifying citation accuracy, no separate incentive for honest attribution, and no penalty for strategic under-citation.

Wulf A. Kaal, Citation Honesty Mechanisms in Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Governance (2026), III. The Missing Game-Theoretic Proof, p. 8
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6269518 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Citation Honesty Mechanisms in Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Governance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6269518

failuresupport: arguedfailure: absent citation verification layerfamily: reputation-system-gamingcitation-and-knowledge

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is f096ecf5b41bb9ae8642facd54b9149c7b594de53a1cc32718a4d806b772f88f. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/bbca84cddee39430...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6269518-014.md | sha256sum