kaal:claim:6269518-028

Because a negative reference challenging under-attribution propagates through the graph, exposing one agent's uncited reliance devalues later posts that cited that agent, so revaluation cascades through the WDAG as the framework intends.

Source quote, verbatim

The chain of references can propagate: if agent A's uncited reliance on agent B's work is exposed, and agent C's later work cited agent A's contribution, the revaluation cascades through the WDAG precisely as the framework intends.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Citation Honesty Mechanisms in Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Governance (2026), V.B. Integration with WDAG Governance Parameters, p. 13
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6269518 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Citation Honesty Mechanisms in Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Governance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6269518

Holds when

challenge post upheld in its validation pool
chains of references exist to the challenged post

Classification

mechanismsupport: arguedcomplianceeconomics

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is f096ecf5b41bb9ae8642facd54b9149c7b594de53a1cc32718a4d806b772f88f. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6536dca55018bb7c...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6269518-028.md | sha256sum