kaal:claim:6607458-040

The standard welfare theorems lose their foundation in the computative domain, and while human welfare plausibly remains the evaluative criterion at the terminal level, the apparatus connecting intermediate agent-to-agent activity to terminal human welfare remains undeveloped.

Source quote, verbatim
The distinction between terminal and proximate consumption (Part II.D) suggests that human welfare remains the evaluative criterion at the terminal level, but the analytical apparatus for connecting intermediate agent-to-agent activity to terminal human welfare assessment remains to be developed.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026), XI. Open Problems, p. 30
https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Missing Normative Apparatusfamily: research-design-limitationinstitutional-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 75cca35350378eb8904866d068b5d2f3e1504629e6031457ce6c12152a88e3e8. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6c73043704e19498...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6607458-040.md | sha256sum