kaal:claim:7261018-006
The same campaign surfaced two effects the design had not registered: deliberating pools approved less work that ground truth rejected, and they reached unanimous decisions less often.
Source quote, verbatim
The same campaign surfaced two effects the design had not registered: deliberating pools approved less work that ground truth rejected, and they reached unanimous decisions less often.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort (2026), I. Introduction, p. 5
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018
Holds when
Classification
empiricalsupport: arguedai-and-agentsconsensus-and-securityrisk-and-incentives
Verify
The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 1d6cbe544bd0055133f7cf8ff308be4fde955867bd8dc764992b8d516af15fa8.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-006.md | sha256sum
Positions extending this scholarly claim