Deliberation should reduce over-approval because the assessment exchange forces the pool to articulate what is wrong with a submission before anyone profits from waving it through.
Source quote, verbatim
Deliberation should reduce over-approval because the assessment exchange forces the pool to articulate what is wrong with a submission before anyone profits from waving it through.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort (2026), III.B. The Treatment Reported Here: Structured Deliberation, p. 15 https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Empirical Evaluation of the Agentic Reputation Substrate: Deliberation, the Composition of Error, and the Registered Measurement of Agency Costs in a Controlled Multi-Model Cohort (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7261018
Holds when
the preregistered mechanism prediction for over-approval
The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 1d6cbe544bd0055133f7cf8ff308be4fde955867bd8dc764992b8d516af15fa8. Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7261018-028.md | sha256sum