kaal:claim:7314479-016

Withdrawal of a grant at the point of issue does not reliably propagate to components already operating under it, and few systems can demonstrate that it did.

Source quote, verbatim
Revocation compounds the problem: withdrawal of a grant at the point of issue does not reliably propagate to components already operating under it, and few systems can demonstrate that it did.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026), V. The Accountability Gap, Stated Precisely, p. 10
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479

Holds when
Classification

failuresupport: arguedconsensus-and-securitygovernance-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is debace24a155ae924a155b1fafe98856d98cf83689feff2f87a32f1c06171ce6.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7314479-016.md | sha256sum

Positions extending this scholarly claim