kaal:claim:7322599-015

False freezes tax honest release value and worsen the release-clock wedge's own admission condition, so challenger bonds, standing rules, and other anti-griefing measures are design candidates whose effects require separate modeling.

False freezes are priced inside the same composites: they tax honest release value, relax the participation floor, and can help the exit constraint only in the badly filed regime. Within the model, griefing therefore worsens the wedge’s own admission condition; challenger bonds, standing rules, and other anti-griefing measures are design candidates whose effects require separate modeling.

Wulf A. Kaal, Refundable Stake Does Not Expand Deterrent Capacity in Long-Lived Delegation: Collateral, Premia, and Pseudonymous Markets (2026), 5 The filing floor and the release-clock wedge, p. 8
https://ssrn.com/abstract=7322599 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Refundable Stake Does Not Expand Deterrent Capacity in Long-Lived Delegation: Collateral, Premia, and Pseudonymous Markets (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7322599

• griefing priced within the model's composites

mechanismsupport: arguedrisk-and-incentivesgovernance-designconsensus-and-security

The quote above is an exact passage from the source PDF, whose sha256 is 130ee4e65fb79a9f3a96f6df22408b40c2de76e9ec8fc2bd1c68f0f6a7104333.
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7322599-015.md | sha256sum