entity · derived
Dispute resolution
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying dispute-resolution. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2992962-002 : The authors stipulate distributed jurisdiction as a regulatory alternative in which conflict resolution for blockchain transactions is supplied by governance solutions inherent in the blockchain techn
- 2992962-019 : Real world court decisions on smart contract disputes, even where attainable, may not carry the same legitimacy and authority for the parties as intra-blockchain dispute resolution mechanisms.
- 2992962-021 : Because courts cannot effectuate resolutions to disputes arising from blockchain based smart contracts, blockchain based resolution mechanisms are the only possible recourse for smart contract dispute
- 2992962-029 : The second core requirement of distributed jurisdiction is governance from within the blockchain technology itself, which is what allows the problems inherent in blockchain based smart contracts to be
- 2992962-033 : Aragon appears not to post even a summary of its arbiters' reasoning, which may cause the losing party to second guess the legitimacy of the entire Aragon dispute resolution mechanism.
- 2992962-035 : The economic incentive for Aragon judges to follow the more popular vote, since judges keep their bond only if they voted with the majority, calls into question whether the mechanism delivers effectiv
- 2992962-037 : In contrast with OpenBazaar, the authors' proposed open source ecosystem allows dispute resolution only if and when a smart contract has actually resulted in a dispute, which keeps smart contracting t
- 3125822-001 : The crypto economy can continue to develop without falling back on centralized regulating authorities only if two things exist: a system for evaluating reputation and trust, and a fair dispute resolut
- 3125822-028 : For decentralized dispute resolution to deliver certainty of outcomes, the arbiter's power to disburse the assets of a contract, once triggered, must be preeminent over the parties.
- 3125822-029 : Arbitration on the platform fails at either end of the fee range: if the parties set fees too low the selected arbiter refuses the work and the arbitration fails, and if arbiters demand fees higher th
- 3125822-032 : Parties to a smart contract must avoid asymmetric encumbrance of assets, because in an anonymous blockchain environment where assets cannot be recovered from parties further down the transaction tree,
- 3125822-038 : There is no absolute certainty that using an expertise tag yields a fair resolution, because malicious experts can always choose an unfair algorithm to distribute the disputed assets.
- 3782201-026 : Aragon's refusal to use its own protocol to arbitrate an internal dispute is testimony to the lack of trust its own system designers place in their system's capabilities, and its reputation and legisl
- 3782205-025 : Decentralized governance design must address all three branches: executive governance as automated policing, legislative governance as non-automated protocol development, and judicial governance as bo
- 3782214-015 : Rigid code is law smart contracts over fungible currency are built to guarantee irreversible, unreviewable, self executing outcomes, which is a poor match for business because business ventures very r
- 4067783-022 : Effective business dealing requires that counterparties have confidence a fair resolution will occur when transactions do not develop as planned, which purely self executing code cannot supply.
- 4529715-038 : Kleros has weak attack resistance because juror selection is proportional to staked fungible tokens; staking reputation rather than tokens to select jurors would remedy this.
- 4855607-036 : Web3 systems provide inexpensive community based smart contract dispute resolution, and these mechanisms minimize legal cost while increasing both the certainty of outcomes and the protections availab
- 5554218-003 : The absence of standardized protocols for dispute resolution and for compliance with regulations such as export controls hinders the scalability of tokenized real world assets and other blockchain bas
- 5554218-011 : Harmonized standards and innovative dispute resolution mechanisms are only partial answers, because they cannot keep pace with the continuously evolving technical requirements of digital assets and sm
- 5554218-017 : Decentralized dispute resolution relies on decentralized networks of jurors, which raises unresolved concerns about juror competence and bias.
- 5554218-030 : The Universal Digital Law Codex is defined as a codex that combines national law, code, and business requirements, accommodates different legal systems, and contains an inherent dispute resolution mec
- 5554218-039 : By defining legal standards for smart contracts, the Universal Digital Law Codex makes arbitration DAO awards enforceable by courts, and its precedent system records outcomes in a transparent ledger t
- 6269518-022 : The retroactive citation audit requires a dispute resolution protocol and evidence standards, which can be developed through the contentious debate mechanism moving from loosely-coupled validation poo