kaal:claim:5554218-017

Decentralized dispute resolution relies on decentralized networks of jurors, which raises unresolved concerns about juror competence and bias.

Source quote, verbatim

DDR's reliance on decentralized networks raises concerns about juror competence and bias, as noted by Salger.

From

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025), 2.6.4 Challenges and Future Directions, p. 16
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218 · source PDF

Cite as

Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218

Holds when

complex disputes over tokenized real world assets

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Juror competence and bias in decentralized adjudicationfamily: enforcement-gapsystemic-risklaw-and-legal-systemsdecentralization

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/73fa1332f2e03388...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-017.md | sha256sum