entity · derived
Fund size
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying fund-size. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2150377-025 : The regulatory regime does not drive fund sizing for most advisers: 82.02% of respondents would not take the current regulatory regime into account in determining the assets under management size of t
- 2150377-026 : Among the minority of advisers who do factor regulation into fund sizing, the pressure runs in both directions: about 25% would go smaller to avoid regulatory hassle while about 50% would grow or need
- 2150377-027 : The Form PF quarterly reporting threshold of $1.5 billion in assets under management is not a binding sizing constraint for most advisers: 80.46% would not take it into account in determining fund siz
- 2150377-028 : Where the Form PF quarterly reporting threshold does influence behavior, it distorts fund size downward: a majority of the advisers who take the threshold into account plan to stay under $1.5 billion
- 2389416-017 : In the period close to and following the registration effective date, fund size has a positive relationship with fund performance, with positive beta coefficients in March through May and July 2012.
- 2816408-021 : In simple linear regressions of monthly returns on log AUM across December 2011 to December 2012, fund size does not appear to matter for fund returns because only a few coefficients are statistically
- 2816408-022 : Fund size shows a negative relationship with performance in the months before the March 2012 registration effective date and a positive relationship afterward, with beta coefficients negative in Janua
- 2816408-026 : Smaller funds outperform larger funds in eight of twelve months in 2012, but performance varies strongly across the subsamples with no clearly dominant group on average.
- 3002908-020 : By optimizing internal processes through blockchain technology, smaller investment fund managers gain unprecedented opportunities to compete with more established managers in markets previously domina
- 3002908-024 : Larger fund managers will adopt blockchain only once the long term benefits exceed implementation cost, and because that cost is much larger for them than for the smaller managers now experimenting, t
- 3002908-026 : The size distribution of blockchain using funds differs sharply across regions: in the United States most such funds hold between one and fifty million dollars in AUM, while in Europe funds with more
- 3002908-029 : A competing explanation for the transatlantic size gap is compositional: American blockchain funds are mostly newly created ad hoc vehicles focused exclusively on blockchain, while European ones are m