entity · derived
Impact 1 0
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying impact-1-0. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 4685567-001 : Growth in philanthropy is the main driver of impact innovation, and the successive phases of impact innovation from Impact 1.0 to Impact 3.0 are responses to that growth.
- 4685567-004 : Because Impact 1.0 entrusted individual donors rather than donor collectives with identifying which problems to solve, individual philanthropists can reshape underfunded causes according to their own
- 4685567-007 : Because Impact 1.0 lacks a liquid and efficient funding marketplace, donors protect their interest by overinvesting in process rather than in impact outcomes directly.
- 4685567-008 : Without a full view of the impact market, Impact 1.0 donors end up funding projects run by people already in their existing networks rather than the most qualified projects judged by objective standar
- 4685567-009 : The absence of an efficient marketplace lets big dollar donors hijack the priorities of impact intermediaries such as foundations, donor advised funds, NGOs and fiscal sponsors, producing a feast or f
- 4685567-014 : Impact 1.0 impact markets fail on the demand side: they have more sellers than buyers, and many potential buyers would have funded those projects anyway, which removes the need for a secondary market