entity · derived
Microdemocracy
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying microdemocracy. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 3709041-015 : Trust in decentralized legal solutions can be more democratically legitimized than legally created trust because it runs through microdemocratic, individualistic yet technology centric autonomous deci
- 3709041-017 : Under a quadratic style microdemocratic allocation, each voter receives a capped number of votes to distribute by priority, so voters concentrate votes on the issues most relevant to them and outcomes
- 3709041-018 : Microdemocratic vote allocation improves outcome quality because a voter's proportional allocation of votes to an issue is itself evidence of that voter's higher knowledge of the issue, and voters are
- 3709041-019 : Vote delegation inevitably reintroduces corruption into a microdemocratic system, because representatives may seek to bribe or purchase votes to gain power, so delegation necessitates a policing syste
- 3709041-020 : Microdemocracies must confront the tragedy of the commons, because voters acting on self-interest independent of the totality of voters may, without controls, deplete or spoil shared resources such as
- 3709041-021 : Majority rule in a microdemocracy can produce discrimination, because a majority that is itself unaffected by a rule it enacts can impose a disproportionate burden on the minority the rule does affect
- 3709041-023 : A blockchain based microdemocracy's key advantage is speed of change: because technology enables incorruptible instantaneous counting and tallying of votes, voting becomes dynamic and incremental and
- 3808867-012 : Delegating one's vote to a third party whose ethics and belief system the voter does not truly know produces suboptimal outcomes, and delegated voting on issues that cannot be foreseen is corrupting.
- 3808867-014 : Ex ante remedies for the downsides of representative democracy were not technologically possible when democratic representation was designed, so its downsides such as corruption, bribery, and bias had
- 3808867-015 : Microdemocratic vote allocation improves voting outcomes because the proportion of votes a voter allocates to an issue evidences that voter's higher level of knowledge on the issue, and voters are unl
- 3808867-016 : Microdemocratic systems must solve the tragedy of the commons, because without controls self interested voters acting independently of the totality of voters may deplete or spoil shared resources such
- 3808867-017 : Majority rule in microdemocratic systems can produce discrimination against minorities, because a majority that is itself unaffected by a rule it instantiates can impose a discriminatory impact on a m
- 3808867-018 : Microdemocracy's key advantage is the speed of change it can initiate: because technology permits incorruptible instantaneous counting and tallying of votes, voting becomes dynamic and incremental and
- 3808867-019 : Unlike their centralized predecessors, decentralized technologies enable, for the first time in history, improved incentive designs that help overcome the insufficiencies in the voting outcomes of rep
- 3808867-020 : Upgrading existing representative democracies with decentralized supplemental voting systems may require constitutional or democratic support, and the availability of that support is dubious at best.
- 3808867-022 : Regulating centralized technology conglomerates addresses only part of the problem, because even fully regulated conglomerates retain the power to set standards and norms for emerging technologies tha