entity · derived
Token minting
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying token-minting. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 3125827-007 : Because at least half of the sem tokens minted when a user buys in with a fee are shared with the community that polices the application, the ability to purchase tokens does not open a profitable 51%
- 3125827-036 : An attacker who buys sem tokens directly from the platform by sending fees must spend at least twice, and more likely six times, the entire historical value of the platform, so the griefing factor is
- 3125827-037 : Under the worst case model with no admission safeguards and no other users paying fees, a malicious group must invest at minimum twice the total sem tokens of the system to reach 50% voting power in t
- 3266953-025 : New reputation tokens are minted in every validation pool for every block, so block production is strongly encouraged through a larger share for the successful producer while policing is only gently e
- 3396542-030 : Barring highly adverse market conditions, the DAO's ability to mint and sell tokens on demand functions as capital on tap and protects the DAO from default and bankruptcy.
- 3782210-015 : Reputation tokens are meaningful only if grounded in something real, so in a profit-seeking DAO all new reputation tokens must be minted in proportion to the fees the DAO earns.
- 3782210-016 : Newly minted reputation tokens should enter the system neutral, staked half in favor and half against the post that generated the fee, so that existing token holders can judge the action fairly and ar