kaal:position:2026-07-31-6212

Civil law issues of Smart Contracts: Focusing on the DAO case presents the following source proposition: 이 글에서는 특히 이더리움 기반의 DAO(Decentralized Autonomous Organization) 사건의 경위를 소개하고 분석함으로써, 이러한 문제점들을 발굴하고 부각하고자 하였다. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that A decentralized autonomous organization is merely computer code with no directors, managers or employees, its governance structure built with software, code and smart contracts running on a public decentralized blockchain platform. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.
Holds when
Current debate

Civil law issues of Smart Contracts: Focusing on the DAO case

Scholarly basis

kaal:claim:3227967-023
Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967
Source PDF sha256: f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f

Evidence and mapping

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.4473
Mapping ambiguous: true

Topics

daosmart-contractsblockchaingovernance-designcorporate-governancehistorical-responsescholarly-literatureopenalex

Provenance

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: 4040c486900e76a1625f0c20989b71bbe96be23723bf7a11ef31d771c481e135
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6212.md | sha256sum