kaal:position:2026-07-31-7095

Blockchain and the Future of Dispute Resolution Decentralized Justice Systems presents the following source proposition: Standard means of conflict resolution whether through courts or arbitration/mediation bodies, regularly face questions of cost, delay, jurisdiction and transparency. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The authors stipulate distributed jurisdiction as a regulatory alternative in which conflict resolution for blockchain transactions is supplied by governance solutions inherent in the blockchain technology itself rather than by external legal authorities. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.4395.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Blockchain and the Future of Dispute Resolution Decentralized Justice Systems

kaal:claim:2992962-002
Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962
Source PDF sha256: 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.4395
Mapping ambiguous: true

law-and-legal-systemsgovernance-designblockchainsystemic-riskhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturesemantic-scholar

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0007 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: a8a54f97746333d2ec2301dd96b79276fc042d70240ca3ef293b5b2d024d7003
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7095.md | sha256sum