kaal:claim:2992962-002

The authors stipulate distributed jurisdiction as a regulatory alternative in which conflict resolution for blockchain transactions is supplied by governance solutions inherent in the blockchain technology itself rather than by external legal authorities.

We suggest a regulatory alternative for blockchain-based conflict resolution by way of governance solutions inherent in the blockchain technology itself. We call this alternative "distributed jurisdiction".

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017), I. Introduction, p. 4
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962

definitionalsupport: assertedlaw-and-legal-systemsgovernance-designblockchainsystemic-risk

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/794ceb8c353c0686...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-002.md | sha256sum

• Qualification: Managing the Transparency and Trade Secret Conflict in AI Accountability: Layered Access as Governance Design
• Qualification: Blockchain and the Future of Dispute Resolution Decentralized Justice Systems
• Extension: Blockchain and the Future of Dispute Resolution Decentralized Justice Systems
• Qualification: Connecting the grids: A review of blockchain governance in distributed energy transitions
• Qualification: Connecting the Grids: A Review of Blockchain Governance in Distributed Energy Transitions
• Qualification: Blockchain Governance in the Wild
• Qualification: Blockchain Governance in the Wild