kaal:position:2026-07-31-7200

International frameworks for AI governance presents the following source proposition: Currently there are multiple partial governance frameworks for AI at the international level, which are neither coherent nor coordinated. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Because neither national nor international law recognizes artificial intelligence as a subject of law, AI has no legal personality and therefore cannot itself be held liable for the damages it causes. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.375.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

International frameworks for AI governance

kaal:claim:2834531-002
Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531
Source PDF sha256: 9cd875ebdb0266febbdcdabfca5b9b9f0de1b7ad9e3d5a8a5971bdbe469323b7

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.375
Mapping ambiguous: true

ai-and-agentslaw-and-legal-systemshistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 2a6a1f110de0ceefde2ad4edc5ca86a65d487fcccfa2cbbf6d87ded2f9b69719
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7200.md | sha256sum