kaal:position:2026-07-31-7251

Operational AI Governance and the Runtime Decision Ownership Gap presents the following source proposition: Existing approaches emphasize model correctness, policy compliance, and system integrity, but provide limited visibility into how humans actually interact with AI at runtime. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that By prescribing the number of board meetings devoted to compliance review and requiring specific board resolutions, CIA provisions let the government contractually determine how and when a board will interact. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3788.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Operational AI Governance and the Runtime Decision Ownership Gap

kaal:claim:2317580-020
Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580
Source PDF sha256: 50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3788
Mapping ambiguous: true

corporate-governancesystemic-riskcompliancehistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 47f74bcfd447e6ea868a36d6d78a7a3a686a2d1902e179793cac8ae90abb2eec
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7251.md | sha256sum