kaal:position:2026-07-31-7293

Can AI governance be progressive? Group interests, group privacy and abnormal justice presents the following source proposition: This paper asks whether our current thin concept of responsibility can be made into a thicker one that takes in more than compliance with law and basic ethical principles. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Smart contracts can automate compliance with regulatory requirements and ethical guidelines: for example, a smart contract can enforce privacy law directly by controlling an AI system's access to personal data according to predefined rules. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3529.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Can AI governance be progressive? Group interests, group privacy and abnormal justice

kaal:claim:4941807-019
Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance Via Web3 Reputation System (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941807
Source PDF sha256: ab66c1e99a88da1fa36b0c6b536df5184231fe6aa427f3dd53287a4e0ac79853

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3529
Mapping ambiguous: true

smart-contractscomplianceconsensus-and-securityblockchaingovernance-designai-and-agentshistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 6901745ac597efe41b593b96770b089ffc05aa8ce5710ba8a4a397ac4ccb71d1
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7293.md | sha256sum