kaal:position:2026-07-31-7466
Why Banking's AI Governance Gap Is a Systemic Risk and the Case for Binding Regulation in India presents the following source proposition: As of 2025, 92% of global banks have deployed AI in at least one core function, while only 32% have formal AI governance programs in place. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Indirect regulation through Basel banking supervision removes the need for joint regulatory action and avoids each national regulator's transaction and implementation costs, because an international framework requires only one implementation and compliance then falls to participating banks. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
systemic-riskhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref