kaal:position:2026-07-31-7661

EU AI Act and the Rights-Based Approach to Technological Governance presents the following source proposition: The European Union AI Act constitutes an important development in shaping the Union’s digital regulatory architecture. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Where bank resolution regimes are not coordinated across jurisdictions, the same systemically important financial institution can be handled in opposite ways: it might petition for reorganization under German law and emerge leaner and more competitive, while its United States operations are liquidated under the Boxer Amendment of the Dodd-Frank Act. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3918.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

EU AI Act and the Rights-Based Approach to Technological Governance

kaal:claim:2061166-001
Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166
Source PDF sha256: 43625ea260d0fc045e86d3435df50c9d0ca4abf8542e6085a6165be6653b4a7b

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3918
Mapping ambiguous: true

systemic-riskregulatory-failurehistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 91b0d5c5ca036f1dde8215600f495eb145cb9994a71f5293986fec2c9d631b2d
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7661.md | sha256sum