kaal:position:2026-07-31-7757

A multi-agent game for studying human decision-making presents the following source proposition: Understanding how human beings delegate tasks to trustees when presented with reputation information is important for building trust models for human-agent collectives. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that For the parts of dealmaking and other legal tasks that cannot be placed on a blockchain, the role of non blockchainable agents of trust may expand, and blockchain driven disintermediation of law may itself create additional legal tasks requiring human lawyers. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3582.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

A multi-agent game for studying human decision-making

kaal:claim:2939127-040
Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127
Source PDF sha256: abcef529c7200261c59eec43018375b3b26e3186239fb9d002bacc298dba26ff

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3582
Mapping ambiguous: true

decentralizationreputationblockchainlaw-and-legal-systemshistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0010 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: a75a801e0863a078cec6ac6cb62eb117cefee48c1b05f18b161a7d24d59c30a3
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7757.md | sha256sum