TrustCarry Protocol v0.3 — Research Claim 057

Sealed record identifier: kaal:research-claim:persona-protocol-v0.3:057

A Persona record should be owned by its subject rather than its host, while append-only integrity should be reconciled with privacy through tombstones, encryption, restricted stores, and selective disclosure.

Author-affirmed proposition from an unpublished research draft. Not part of the 5,033 published-source scholarly claim layer.
Holds when
Supporting passage
Two constraints follow. First, the record must be owned by its subject rather than by a host. On centralized platforms, "users earned their reputation but do NOT own reputation," and an account deletion destroys years of history with "near zero ability to reclaim the data," while scores remain "trapped in Silos" with no path to aggregation across platforms (Calcaterra, Kaal, and Sivalingam 2018, claims 3266953-009 and 3266953-010). Portability of the evidence commitment is the remedy. Second, append-only integrity does not justify indefinite public exposure. Tombstones, encryption, restricted stores, and selective disclosure preserve accountability without making sensitive content universally public.
Provenance

TrustCarry Protocol v0.3 (historical title: Persona Protocol v0.3), line 224. Source sha256: 38efc43b80ab62426ca1f946114677afeda730bca30dda71dfd299223a6def7c.

License

CC BY 4.0; attribution to Wulf A. Kaal and the canonical record URL.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: 8192646c004c84c5f313bd07555156326621f1f2f49de436076c496264609b63