kaal:claim:1558614-011
A country whose bankers do not embrace intentional risk taking is still exposed to risk, both through the collateral effects of intentional risk taking abroad and through unintentional risk taking at home, so domestic cultural restraint is not a sufficient safeguard.
Source quote, verbatim
Countries where bankers do not typically embrace intentional risk taking are still vulnerable to collateral effects of intentional risk taking in other countries as well as unintentional risk taking in their own financial institutions
From
Cite as
Holds when
Classification
failuresupport: arguedfailure: imported risk exposurefamily: systemic-risk-transmissionrisk-and-incentivessystemic-riskdynamic-regulation
Verify
Positions extending this scholarly claim