kaal:claim:1664809-036

Exporting and imposing rules through extraterritorial reach could be counterproductive not only for US diplomacy but also for international cooperation in combating securities fraud, whereas cooperative mutual adjustment between the US and the EU is the better course.

Exporting and imposing rules through extraterritorial reach, on the other hand, could be counterproductive not only for US diplomacy but also for international cooperation in combating

Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for (2010), 4.8. Diplomacy, p. 8
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809 · source PDF

Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for (2010). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809

• cross-border securities fraud enforcement

designsupport: arguedfailure: counterproductive-unilateralismfamily: jurisdictional-conflictsecurities-law

• restated_by kaal:claim:1765901-033 Changing national rules in a spirit of cooperation among states and regulators is more productive for preventi...
• restated_by kaal:claim:1765901-037 A clear and restrained U.S. approach to extraterritoriality will bring predictability to global securities mar...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 2d5c8c30f969f8eb613bfa1fe6888a7cfa1a452e1027bcda0489618ceac62c20. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/c3e271fa556b5083...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1664809-036.md | sha256sum