kaal:claim:1765901-012

Morrison provides no clear parameters for classifying privately negotiated transactions as domestic or foreign, because the case involved publicly traded securities and never reached the question.

There are currently no clear parameters for defining the location of privately negotiated transactions as domestic or foreign transactions under Morrison. Morrison did not explore this issue because that case involved securities that were publicly traded — in Australia.

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011), II. Open Questions After Morrison; 3. When Does a Private Transaction Take Place in the U.S.?, p. 13
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1765901 · source PDF

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

• privately negotiated securities and derivative transactions

failuresupport: arguedfailure: private-transaction-location-gapfamily: otherlaw-and-legal-systems

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5. Extraction method: ocr.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/b1d2469a422b3db9...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-012.md | sha256sum