kaal:claim:1765901-014

Locating a private transaction by the location of the parties is often unworkable, because the parties are frequently institutions simultaneously present in the United States and abroad, and individual parties are often in transit.

Parties to a private transaction are often institutions having a simultaneous presence in the U.S. and abroad. Individual parties to a private transaction are often in transit.

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011), II. Open Questions After Morrison; 3. When Does a Private Transaction Take Place in the U.S.?, p. 15
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1765901 · source PDF

Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

• private transactions in conventional securities
• institutional and mobile parties

failuresupport: arguedfailure: party-location-indeterminacyfamily: otherinstitutional-design

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5. Extraction method: ocr.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5601c41ba53db505...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-014.md | sha256sum