kaal:claim:1998455-006

The anecdotal record of ethically questionable conduct by leaders of systemically important financial institutions is not dispositive and does not establish an underlying trend, but it does show that some of the most pervasive cases of unethical conduct involved such institutions.

The anecdotal evidence pertaining to ethically questionable conduct of SIFI leaders is certainly not dispositive or indicative of underlying trends. It does seem to show, however, that some of the most pervasive cases of unethical conduct did involve SI- FIs.

Wulf A. Kaal, Initial Reflections on the Possible Application of Contingent Capital in Corporate Governance (2012), II. Governance Challenges for Systemically Important Financial Institutions, p. 14
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1998455 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Initial Reflections on the Possible Application of Contingent Capital in Corporate Governance (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1998455

• based on the high profile cases surveyed: Citigroup, Bear Stearns, AIG, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers

empiricalsupport: evidencedsystemic-riskempirical-evidence

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 1c16ff10a284469ba15fb7ba5523449b917388ee692d9b394f9e8c094544e32c. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a41e0f2fcb2ba079...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1998455-006.md | sha256sum