kaal:claim:2061166-016

The supervisor's discretion to set a deadline for a recovery plan before issuing a transfer order is unlikely ever to be exercised in practice, because in a crisis time will be of the essence to prevent contagion.

Source quote, verbatim

Considering the turmoil of the financial crisis, it is doubtful that the Authority will ever have the privilege to exercise this discretion as time will be of the essence to prevent contagion.

From

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012), (b) Regulatory intervention powers and procedures, p. 47
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166 · source PDF

Cite as

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166

Holds when

asset transfer to a bridge bank under the German Banking Act
crisis conditions with contagion risk

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Recovery-plan deadline unusable under time pressurefamily: supervisory-capacity-gapsystemic-risk

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 43625ea260d0fc045e86d3435df50c9d0ca4abf8542e6085a6165be6653b4a7b. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6f5e20c3d3beb098...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-016.md | sha256sum