kaal:claim:2061166-020

The German Banking Act requirement that a bridge bank have its head office inside Germany is of highly questionable compatibility with European Union law, specifically the principle of free movement of capital under Article 63 TFEU.

It is highly questionable whether this requirement conforms to the Law of the European Union, namely the principal of free movement of capital, TFEU, art. 63.

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012), (b) Regulatory intervention powers and procedures, p. 47
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166 · source PDF

Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166

• bridge bank transferee requirements under the German Banking Act

failuresupport: arguedfailure: National bridge bank residency requirement conflicts with EU lawfamily: jurisdictional-conflictsystemic-risklaw-and-legal-systems

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 43625ea260d0fc045e86d3435df50c9d0ca4abf8542e6085a6165be6653b4a7b. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/a2d36146101fa8cc...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-020.md | sha256sum