kaal:claim:2150377-019

Comparison of the responding sample against the full registered population on Form ADV parameters shows the sample is not biased toward any particular subgroup of hedge fund advisers, and gives no indication that respondents differ from nonrespondents.

Source quote, verbatim

The descriptive statistics demonstrate that the sample is not biased and does not favor a particular subgroup of hedge fund advisers.189 There is no indication that respondents who did respond to the survey were different from individuals who did not respond.

From

Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2012), C. Selection Bias
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2150377 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2150377

Holds when

parameters reported on Form ADV such as organizational form, client numbers, adviser type, region, AUM, and advisory services

Classification

empiricalsupport: evidencedempirical-evidenceprivate-fundsresearch-methods

Related claims

extended_by kaal:claim:2739479-018 Neither the 2012 nor the 2015 sample is biased, and the comparison across the two populations is consistent be...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 0b58bb409cac7674d78515f5374096f9a349de3bbd1983c990e0edc85a635a09. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/88f080ad79deb661...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2150377-019.md | sha256sum