kaal:claim:2150377-026

Among the minority of advisers who do factor regulation into fund sizing, the pressure runs in both directions: about 25% would go smaller to avoid regulatory hassle while about 50% would grow or need a certain size to cover the increased expenses.

A significant number (25%) would go smaller to avoid the regulatory hassle. A larger percentage (50%) expressed either increasing current AUM size to cover expenses or mentioned the need for a certain size in order to account for the increase in expenses.

Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2012), D. Assets Under Management
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2150377 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Fund Manager Registration Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2150377

• respondents who answered yes to survey Question 7.b

mechanismsupport: evidencedcomplianceeconomicsempirical-evidence

• restated_by kaal:claim:2732915-029 Among advisers who factor the regulatory regime into fund sizing, the direction of adjustment is split: 18.2 p...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 0b58bb409cac7674d78515f5374096f9a349de3bbd1983c990e0edc85a635a09. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/cd33be5613e9daca...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2150377-026.md | sha256sum