kaal:claim:2267560-021

Opportunities for integrating dynamic elements into the rulemaking process include intra-jurisdictional feedback processes, feedback effects between private and public rulemakers, inter-jurisdictional feedback processes, informal rules, and organizational culture.

(i) intra-jurisdictional feedback processes such as (i) exchanges and synergies between public rulemakers and regulators, (ii) feedback effects between private and public rulemakers, (iii) inter-jurisdictional feedback processes, (iv) informal rules, and (v) organizational culture.

Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Law Dynamic Regulation in a New Institutional Economics Framework (2013), III. Rulemaking in a Dynamic Framework, p. 8
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2267560 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Law Dynamic Regulation in a New Institutional Economics Framework (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2267560

designsupport: asserteddynamic-regulationinstitutional-design

• restated_by kaal:claim:5886442-030 Dynamic regulation is defined as an optimization process for the learning experience in the New Institutional ...
• restated_by kaal:claim:2957645-010 Feedback effects, defined as informational exchange processes between public and private rulemakers, between o...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7ecc9dd1826121a95bf252476cdaa1c8737ad8079e12caf66c4342ffae7af8af. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/8be6badd22b00eef...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2267560-021.md | sha256sum