kaal:claim:2273857-009

Rulemakers discount or willingly accept unknown future contingencies and the inevitable need for later revision, amendment, and retraction, because they are pursuing certainty and predictability in the rules they enact.

To attain certainty and increase predictability, rulemakers discount or often willingly accept unknown future contingencies and the inevitable need for rule revision, amendments, and retractions.

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry (2013), I. Introduction, p. 10
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857

• rulemakers prioritize certainty and predictability

mechanismsupport: argueddynamic-regulationlaw-and-legal-systems

• extended_by kaal:claim:2831040-006 The pacing problem is partly a byproduct of the goal of legal certainty: because regulation is designed to be ...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7cb3dea40593135acc99a9b00690138fe01020514ebf388f5140e1b0e59e82a. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/452b4d251f336c0b...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-009.md | sha256sum