kaal:claim:2273857-048

In a dynamic framework rulemaking ceases to be a merely reactive process driven by the collective action problem, and instead increasingly uses institution specific and decentralized information that both reflects preceding events and anticipates future contingencies.

rulemaking in a dynamic framework increasingly utilizes institution specific and decentralized information reflecting preceding events and attempting to anticipate succeeding future contingencies.

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry (2013), III.1 Rulemaking with Dynamic Elements, p. 24
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation of the Financial Services Industry (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2273857

• dynamic elements are incorporated into the rulemaking process

designsupport: argueddecentralizationdynamic-regulation

• extended_by kaal:claim:2957645-009 Increased availability of relevant, decentralized, and timely information for rulemaking is what makes anticip...
• restated_by kaal:claim:kaal-2014-dynamicregulationviagove-001 Dynamic regulation is a supplemental regulatory tool, not a replacement for existing rulemaking: it increases ...
• restated_by kaal:claim:2740477-004 Dynamic regulation is defined as the study of regulatory phenomena in relation to both preceding and succeedin...
• restated_by kaal:claim:2808132-005 Dynamic regulation is defined as conceptualizing regulatory phenomena in relation to both preceding and succee...
• generalizes kaal:claim:2486570-029 Department of Justice investigations of particular corporate wrongdoers generate highly relevant, decentralize...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is e7cb3dea40593135acc99a9b00690138fe01020514ebf388f5140e1b0e59e82a. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/5af8278c38e757a3...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2273857-048.md | sha256sum

• Qualification: Projection-Specific Dynamic Regulation of Inhibition in Amygdala Micro-Circuits.
• Qualification: Dynamic regulation of functionally distinct virus-specific T cells
• Qualification: Volition in Action: Intentions, Control Dilemmas, and the Dynamic Regulation of Cognitive Control
• Qualification: Dynamic Regulation of MALAT1 in Leader Cell Formation and Collective Cancer Invasion
• Qualification: Dynamic regulation of ROCK in tumor cells controls CXCR4-driven adhesion events
• Qualification: Dynamic regulation of the cerebral cavernous malformation pathway controls vascular stability and growth
• Qualification: Simultaneous Monitoring Cytoplasmic Calcium Ion and Cell Surface Phosphatidylserine in the Necrotic Touch Neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans.
• Qualification: Endoplasmic Reticulum-Targeting Quinazolinone-Based Lipophilic Probe for Specific Photoinduced Ferroptosis and Its Induced Lipid Dynamic Regulation.
• Qualification: Reactive Power Optimization Strategy for Power Grid with High Proportion of Renewable Energy Based on Reinforcement Learning Algorithm
• Qualification: Dynamic regulation method of distributed generation in distribution network under 5G network
• Qualification: A Systematic Analysis of Military Turnover Determinants: An Application of the Price-Mueller Model
• Qualification: Dynamic regulation of permissive histone modifications and GATA3 binding underpin acquisition of granzyme A expression by virus‐specific CD8+ T cells
• Qualification: Erratum: Guilhemsang et al., “Preferential Modulatory Action of 5-HT2A Receptors on the Dynamic Regulation of Basal Ganglia Circuits”
• Qualification: The MYCN driven murine and human neuroblastoma methylome and dynamic regulation of chromatin regulators as a guide for epigenetic therapy