kaal:claim:2486570-023

Because the board changes mandated by non and deferred prosecution agreements consist largely of additional reporting obligations and committee reform rather than removal of officers or directors, those reforms alone may not create sufficient incentives for boards and management to improve governance and avoid execution of an agreement.

Source quote, verbatim
These reforms alone may not create sufficient incentives for boards and management to improve governance and avoid N/DPA execution.
From

Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20 (2014), VI.B. IMPLICATIONS FOR BOARDS, MANAGEMENT, AND LEGAL COUNSEL, p. 55
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570 · source PDF

Cite as

Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20 (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570

Classification

failuresupport: arguedfailure: insufficient-board-incentivesfamily: board-and-oversight-failurecorporate-governancerisk-and-incentivesgovernance-design

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 8c3981c9a55d8a3fe59a01660584eebc3feb3fb9109ca65344095bebe4ae49a4. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/0e543f0e6d506a1a...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2486570-023.md | sha256sum