Because 63.47 percent of the sampled agreements were executed even after the corporation had already instituted preemptive remedial measures, the current quantity, quality, comprehensiveness, and effectiveness of those preemptive measures may be insufficient to prevent an agreement.
Source quote, verbatim
execution of N/DPAs after the institution of pre- emptive remedial measures (63.47 percent of the N/DPAs in the sample), the current quantity, quality, comprehensiveness, and effectiveness of preemptive remedial measures may be insufficient.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20 (2014), VI.B. IMPLICATIONS FOR BOARDS, MANAGEMENT, AND LEGAL COUNSEL, p. 56 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20 (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 8c3981c9a55d8a3fe59a01660584eebc3feb3fb9109ca65344095bebe4ae49a4. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/da019e80660be508...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2486570-025.md | sha256sum