kaal:claim:2714974-030

Proposals for indirect regulation of hedge funds through the regulation of the financial institutions that interact with them are unlikely to become legally binding.

Source quote, verbatim

Such proposals are unlikely to become legally binding.

From

Kaal and Oesterle, The History of Hedge Fund Regulation in the United States (2016), INDIRECT HEDGE FUND REGULATION, p. 24
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2714974 · source PDF

Cite as

Kaal and Oesterle, The History of Hedge Fund Regulation in the United States (2016). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2714974

Classification

predictivesupport: assertedsystemic-riskprivate-funds

Related claims

contested_by kaal:claim:3405660-029 The three pillars of Basel II and its successors are rules addressed to banks that thereby indirectly regulate...

Verify

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 7764601d3ed5bb056b58949e8411eff9dfb9855f143719062030c980c5fa801b. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/f193b349779d84aa...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2714974-030.md | sha256sum