Sensitivity to the Form PF quarterly reporting threshold rose sharply: only 19 percent of 2012 respondents took the $1.5 billion threshold into account, compared with 33 percent in 2015.
Source quote, verbatim
In 2012, only 19% of respondents took the Form PF quar- terly threshold into account, whereas 33% of respondents in 2015 found the threshold relevant.
From
Wulf A. Kaal, The Post Dodd-Frank Act Evolution of the Private Fund Industry Comparative Evidence from 2012 and 2 (2016), IV.3. Assets Under Management, p. 43 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2739479 · source PDF
Cite as
Wulf A. Kaal, The Post Dodd-Frank Act Evolution of the Private Fund Industry Comparative Evidence from 2012 and 2 (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2739479
Holds when
survey respondents in 2012 and 2015
the $1.5 billion Form PF quarterly reporting threshold
extendskaal:claim:2732915-032 A majority of adviser respondents, 66.7 percent, did not take the $1.5 billion Form PF quarterly reporting thr...
extendskaal:claim:2150377-027 The Form PF quarterly reporting threshold of $1.5 billion in assets under management is not a binding sizing c...
extendskaal:claim:2150377-028 Where the Form PF quarterly reporting threshold does influence behavior, it distorts fund size downward: a maj...
Verify
The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is b2e7b81a16ab01c73478b62e85068f9dadc5cdd18427241e8bc5e8216a967730. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer. Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/6a4c5bf22fafa4dc...json Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2739479-030.md | sha256sum