kaal:claim:2808132-015

The current regulatory framework lacks any mechanism that anticipatorily informs rulemakers of beneficial innovative ideas, and because the rulemaking process prohibits ex parte communications and integrates cross-industry brainstorming poorly, the process may actually undermine innovation.

informs rulemakers of beneficial innovative ideas. In fact, the existing rulemaking process prohibits ex parte communications and insufficiently integrates brainstorming and ideas across industries, and therefore may actually undermine innovation.

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016), III. Disruptive Innovation as a Regulatory Challenge, p. 18
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 · source PDF

Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

• notice and comment rulemaking under the existing administrative framework

failuresupport: arguedfailure: Ex parte prohibition information blockadefamily: regulatory-laginnovationdynamic-regulationregulatory-failure

• extends kaal:claim:2740477-015 The existing rulemaking process prohibits ex parte communications and insufficiently integrates brainstorming ...
• extends kaal:claim:2740477-014 The current regulatory framework contains no mechanism that succinctly and anticipatorily informs rulemakers o...
• restated_by kaal:claim:2834531-010 The current regulatory framework contains no mechanism that informs rulemakers of beneficial innovative ideas ...

The quote above is an exact substring of the source PDF, whose sha256 is 3515f2317ed9c1d33ae55d70467cdf1f6c4e350065ea6a887d5d7619599ad7d2. Extraction method: pdf-text-layer.
Attestation record: colloquium/attestations/d757709baada0255...json
Verify the binding yourself: curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-015.md | sha256sum